| bio | website | transat-creative.fr |
|---|---|---|
| location | Montreuil, France | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years |
| seen | Nov 13 '11 at 12:22 | |
| stats | profile views | 7 |
|
Nov 15 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov 5 |
comment |
How I check if the same post slug has not been used before publishing? Thanks Volpeo... but I couldn't get it working. In the case of a yet published post which have the same title than an other, the error message is correctly displayed, but after I changed some custom field's content and republish the same error message is displayed. In the case of a new post, clicking the "publish" button does nothing (ajax-loading image runs endlessly), regardless the title of this post is unique or not. |
|
Nov 3 |
revised |
How I check if the same post slug has not been used before publishing? added 274 characters in body; edited title |
|
Oct 17 |
comment |
How I check if the same post slug has not been used before publishing? Understood. You're right, I do want the post not to be saved with a yet existing title. Thanks anyway for your explanations. As the plugin which generates title from custom fields is based on jQuery, I wonder how to extend it in a database handling purpose. |
|
Oct 17 |
comment |
How I check if the same post slug has not been used before publishing? I changed the post type for "concerts" in place of "event". The code is in my functions.php file. But when I click the "publish" button of my new post (with custom fields filled exactly like an other one, to get the same title) the page is saved as usual... |
|
Oct 17 |
comment |
How I check if the same post slug has not been used before publishing? Hi Soulseekah, and thanks a lot. The first solution looks interesting as I really want to avoid any duplicate post. Unfortunately it didn't work for me... |
|
Oct 16 |
asked | How I check if the same post slug has not been used before publishing? |
|
May 30 |
awarded | Student |
|
May 28 |
comment |
Fail to compare dates in meta_query Thanks Milo, it now works like a charm ! meta_value_num did the job right, I'm wondering why no one noticed such a detail in this similar thread : bit.ly/l88vup |
|
May 26 |
revised |
Fail to compare dates in meta_query deleted 4 characters in body |
|
May 26 |
awarded | Editor |
|
May 26 |
revised |
Fail to compare dates in meta_query added 148 characters in body; deleted 9 characters in body |
|
May 26 |
asked | Fail to compare dates in meta_query |