Take the 2-minute tour ×
WordPress Development Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for WordPress developers and administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Today milestone 3.3.3 was completed – five days after version 3.4. I have seen the same with milestone 3.2.2 which was never released.

WordPress does not offer any long term support as Matt once explained. See also: Will there be security updates for 3.1 once 3.2 is released?

3.3.3 is a security backport – somewhat understandable – but the backports 3.2.2 were mostly not security related.

What is going on here? As an administrator and developer – should I care?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 14 down vote accepted

The only reason why the 3.3.3 milestone was marked as completed is because leaving the milestone open interfered with our ticket reports for 3.4.1. (I forgot that milestone closures are reflected in the timeline.)

Generally speaking, we assign tickets to the next minor milestone if they are reporting an immediate regression. So, a regression in 3.2 that comes up during the development of 3.3 would have been assigned to 3.2.2, as happened here. In this case, we went so far as to close these tickets with a commit against the 3.2 branch. We do this sometimes mainly for housekeeping reasons, and so if there is the need for a release, we are more prepared. But since nothing triggered a release of 3.2.2 (a sufficiently critical bug or something security-related), we just closed the milestone. This is helpful for tracking purposes. We could have just as easily deleted it and re-assigned all of the tickets to 3.3. We just didn't in this case.

Edit, adding more background: It is worth noting that we always strive for version branches to be as stable as possible. So, if you are running the 3.2 branch and always kept it updated, you might be running something "more stable" than the 3.2.1 stable release. These kinds of extra fixes do often get into a branch after the final point release for that branch, and thus are not released.

We have released formal packages on rare occasions — 3.0.6 was released at the same time as 3.1.2. In general, we have tried to maintain the second-newest branch (e.g. 3.0) until the current development branch (e.g. 3.2) has reached "beta" status. We didn't announce the availability of 3.0.6, but anyone running the 3.0 branch could at least have updated to those fixes via official channels.

share|improve this answer
8  
Put your hand in the air if that confused the hell out of you ;) Raises hand –  Brady Jun 19 '12 at 7:06
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.